oddly · 1 live grant(s) · updated 2026-09-27
Each grant below names an agent, what it may decide, the evidence class it may decide on unaided, and who takes the rest. Agreement is measured on a rolling window; falling below the bar revokes the grant.
| Agent | May decide | Unaided on | State | Agreement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corpus producer (store vetting) A storefront whose sources disagree about its own currency is exactly the case a human is for, so conflict escalates rather than picking a winner. |
Register a vetted candidate storefront into the benchmark corpus without a human | unanimous-sourcesOtherwise: The human vetting queue |
Granted Granted by Kyle Peh on 2026-08-14 |
No samples yet Bar: 95% over 20 |
| Corpus producer (category admission) home_market is the whole category half. comparison_scope was held out of this grant as a policy label with no published store fact to observe, until DR-2026-08-29-scope-is-a-query-parameter ruled scope a query parameter chosen per read rather than an admission label; arming this grant now completes the category half rather than leaving one label behind. |
Register the home_market label of a benchmark crawl category without a human | unanimous-marketOtherwise: The human vetting queue |
Shadow Not granted. Measured only. |
No samples yet Bar: 95% over 20 |
| oddly runner (hold releaser) Held-for-Kyle is terminal for the runner (Kyle ruling C, 2026-08-12). A hold ends when a person ends it, never because a re-diff came back clear, so no agreement rate can earn this one. |
Move a gated build from Held-for-Kyle back to PR open | Nothing. Every case escalates. Otherwise: An allowlisted owner's attestation on the current head commit |
Shadow Not granted. Measured only. |
No samples yet Bar: 95% over 20 |
| Reviewer agent (independent grader, automation/phase4/reviewer) Tier 1 is never in scope at any agreement rate: the reviewer cannot clear a change to its own grader, so the authority can never widen itself. |
Post a binding approval that clears a Tier 2 self-modification pull request | claims-fully-verifiedOtherwise: Kyle |
Shadow Not granted. Measured only. |
No samples yet Bar: 95% over 20 |
A grant acts unaided only on evidence its class grades as clean. The grading is mechanical: these are the rules, not a description of them.
claims-fully-verified
Every claim the reviewer re-derived from the diff is marked verified, and it listed nothing it could not verify. One refuted claim makes the class contested; one unverifiable claim, or any honest-null entry, makes it insufficient.
unanimous-sources
At least two independent sources returned a reading and every reading is identical. Any disagreement makes the class contested; fewer than two readings makes it insufficient.
owner-attestation-on-head
An allowlisted owner approved this exact head commit. An approval on any earlier commit is a stale attestation and does not carry: consent attaches to content, never to a pull request number.
unanimous-market
At least two independent peer storefronts each resolved a home market from their OWN published facts (ccTLD, then an unambiguous single-market currency) and every reading is identical. Any disagreement makes the class contested; fewer than two readings makes it insufficient. A store whose facts name no market contributes a null, which neither conflicts nor counts.
This table is generated from the same register the running code consults, so a grant shown here is the grant enforced. It is not a description of policy.
Back to the trust center